[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions

To: wg-b@dnso.org
Subject: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 1999 12:05:13 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m11Mv75-0008G3C@rip.psg.com>
References: <m11Mh2H-00000fC@roam.psg.com><3.0.32.19990901163312.006b2c2c@pop.enteract.com><4.2.0.58.19990902110112.01cf4550@dokka.maxware.no><3.0.2.32.19990903105225.00d3d11c@pop.interport.net>
Sender: owner-wg-b@dnso.org

At 08:18 AM 9/3/99 -0700, you wrote:
>if the law to protect these marks already exists, what need is there for
>icann to do anything other than it already plans, which is to have the
>dispute resolution process be based upon law?
>
>randy
>

I don't necessarily disagree with you if the UDRP (which, let's remember is
not yet a done deal), in combination with the other stuff (verifiable
contact info, prepayment and searchable database) is in place.  My problems
with the exclusion is that it seems to provide little marginal improvement
over a decently-run UDRP.

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

References:
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: eileen kent <eileenk@enteract.com>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <Harald@alvestrand.no>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: "Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>
- Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
  - From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-b] "Oops" domains
Next by Date: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
Next by thread: Re: [wg-b] Preliminary Questions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread