Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.

["Martin B. Schwimmer" <martys@interport.net>]

If I had hoped to be taken at faith, I would not have provided the means of
being un-masked, namely the citation.  Maybe I fabricated this case.  Maybe
there are three Canadian cases which go the other way.  I'm just trying to
get the conversation focused on the law.


At 02:59 PM 4/17/00 -0400, you wrote:
>From: Martin B. Schwimmer <martys@interport.net>
>Sent: Monday, April 17, 2000 2:06 PM
>Subject: Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.
>
>
>> Canadian Tire Corporation v. Retail Clerks Union, Local 1518, (1985), 7
>> Canadian Patent Reporter (3d) 416 (FCTD).
>
>Okay, I'll admit that I don't have the "Canadian Patent Reporter" handy, so
>without a budget for fact-checking this one, it's just a pretty citation.
>Given that the previous cite you provided went explicitly out of its way to
>avoid the proposition you impute to it, I'm disinclined to take this one on
>faith.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

@ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @