Re: [wg-b] Protections for Noncommercial gTLDs.

["John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D." <john@johnberryhill.com>]

> If I had hoped to be taken at faith, I would not have provided the means
of
> being un-masked, namely the citation.  Maybe I fabricated this case.
Maybe
> there are three Canadian cases which go the other way.  I'm just trying to
> get the conversation focused on the law.

I understand and appreciate that.  The Brach's case you cited held the
opposite of what you suggested that it did.  The court expressly allowed the
union to use the name.

So there are two things one can conclude here.  One is that you are
repeating citations from McCarthy without bothering to see what the cases
say, and that is the most charitable conclusion that can be drawn.