Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting

[bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)]

Considering their are Congressional hearings going on right now about ICANN
"closed meetings," I don't think this is a good idea. Unless you'd like to
web cast the conference call as well, or make call-in lines available to
each and all (after announcing it on ga@dnso.org)....

Bill Semich


At 11:47 AM 7/19/99 -0400, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>hello ivan.
>i am not ducking your question but this is an item along with some other
>brought up recently which we could better explore & "vet" out  in a conf
>call (we could
>"minute"  the call & post to the list  if members wished as well)
>what about the idea of considering  a conf call for the wg and hashing out
>some of these issues. i am on a plane right now and unable to fwd this
>message to the wg... would you fwd the message please and see if we can get
>some comments from the group.
>
>thanks
>
>ken
>i believe core would assist on subsidizing the call as long as wg  members
>felt comfortable with that. (if any company,group, or individual wants to
>kick in to help defray the cost thats great with me too !!!)
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
>To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 7:05 AM
>Subject: RE: gTLD Trademark Applications
>
>
>>Well, Javier proposed that the CORE/POC seven names be proposed to the DNSO
>>as the first set of gTLDs. And I said I thought that CORE had applied for
>>Trademarks on them (in other words, making them even more a CORE set of
>>names). But no-one seems to know if CORE has, so I thought we should
>clarify
>>the situation.
>>So I asked you. It's a Working Group and we are addressing the question.
>>Chris Ambler is quick to assert his claims on .web, for example, which as a
>>bearing.
>>So, I hope you can help us.
>>Thanks,
>>Ivan
>>
>>> what bearing does it have on the working group ivan ?
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
>>> To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>>> Cc: 'wg-c@dnso.org' <wg-c@dnso.org>
>>> Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 5:24 AM
>>> Subject: gTLD Trademark Applications
>>>
>>>
>>> >Ken,
>>> >It has been suggested (by me) that CORE has applied for
>>> Trademarks on the
>>> >CORE/POC 'seven' gTLDs. I am sure I read this recently.
>>> >As this has a lot of bearing on the Working Group, could you
>>> clarify the
>>> >situation. Namely, has CORE or does CORE intend to apply for
>>> Trademarks on
>>> >any gTLDs?
>>> >Thanks,
>>> >Ivan
>>> >
>>>
>>
>
>
>