Re: [wg-c] Re: working group c meeting

["Mark C. Langston" <skritch@home.com>]

At the very least, the conference call should allow active (i.e.,
actual call-in) participation from every member of the WG.



On 19 July 1999, bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich) wrote:


>Considering their are Congressional hearings going on right now about ICANN
>"closed meetings," I don't think this is a good idea. Unless you'd like to
>web cast the conference call as well, or make call-in lines available to
>each and all (after announcing it on ga@dnso.org)....
>
>Bill Semich
>
>
>At 11:47 AM 7/19/99 -0400, Ken Stubbs wrote:
>>hello ivan.
>>i am not ducking your question but this is an item along with some other
>>brought up recently which we could better explore & "vet" out  in a conf
>>call (we could
>>"minute"  the call & post to the list  if members wished as well)
>>what about the idea of considering  a conf call for the wg and hashing out
>>some of these issues. i am on a plane right now and unable to fwd this
>>message to the wg... would you fwd the message please and see if we can get
>>some comments from the group.
>>
>>thanks
>>
>>ken
>>i believe core would assist on subsidizing the call as long as wg  members
>>felt comfortable with that. (if any company,group, or individual wants to
>>kick in to help defray the cost thats great with me too !!!)
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
>>To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>>Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 7:05 AM
>>Subject: RE: gTLD Trademark Applications
>>
>>
>>>Well, Javier proposed that the CORE/POC seven names be proposed to the DNSO
>>>as the first set of gTLDs. And I said I thought that CORE had applied for
>>>Trademarks on them (in other words, making them even more a CORE set of
>>>names). But no-one seems to know if CORE has, so I thought we should
>>clarify
>>>the situation.
>>>So I asked you. It's a Working Group and we are addressing the question.
>>>Chris Ambler is quick to assert his claims on .web, for example, which as a
>>>bearing.
>>>So, I hope you can help us.
>>>Thanks,
>>>Ivan
>>>
>>>> what bearing does it have on the working group ivan ?
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ivan Pope <ivan@netnames.com>
>>>> To: 'Ken Stubbs' <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>>>> Cc: 'wg-c@dnso.org' <wg-c@dnso.org>
>>>> Date: Monday, July 19, 1999 5:24 AM
>>>> Subject: gTLD Trademark Applications
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> >Ken,
>>>> >It has been suggested (by me) that CORE has applied for
>>>> Trademarks on the
>>>> >CORE/POC 'seven' gTLDs. I am sure I read this recently.
>>>> >As this has a lot of bearing on the Working Group, could you
>>>> clarify the
>>>> >situation. Namely, has CORE or does CORE intend to apply for
>>>> Trademarks on
>>>> >any gTLDs?
>>>> >Thanks,
>>>> >Ivan
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>