[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] Election of co-chair
At 07:59 AM 26/07/1999 -0400, Kevin J. Connolly wrote:
>
>It also bears noting that there are persons posting on this list whose
>agendae do not appear to be consistent with the production of a report
>of any kind, let alone a timely report. The time has come for those of us
>who are responding to the charter to start recognizing the trolls and
treating
>them accordingly.
>
The WG is not an Association, Kevin. It is open exactly because it is to
produce a report. The other voices need to be heard ,considered and
incorporated in the report.
echo of Dave Crocker on the ifwp list
>> Because some participants have no interest in a real consensus
>> process. They will not discuss reasonably and they will not
>> compromise. Hence, they wail and decry, but do not contribute
>> constructively.
>
>> These people must be removed from the calculation of consensus. When you
>> remove them, you are left with a much more reasonable degree of agreement,
>> and yes, concerns.
>
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.-- , bootstrap of
the Cyberspace Association,
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
http://www.idno.org