[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?

To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>, "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>
Subject: RE: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
From: "Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 22:42:57 -0700
Cc: "Javier SOLA" <javier@aui.es>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <006901bee2f0$70380320$f78ad0d8@storm3.sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> Behalf Of Ross Wm. Rader
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 10:23 PM

> Does that then mean that the fact that we will actually lose
> TLDs over time is not a justification to require such?

Prejudicial question... The fact remains to be proven therefore the
justification does not exist. I posit that the fact is not extant.

References:
- Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] "Public" resources
Prev by thread: Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread