Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

>
>Well, the problem with doing that is that this is the primary
>justification for the proposals being made by Javier, the CORE
>factions, and indeed by yourself below.
>


I don't think that I've advocated any particular position below, related my
opinion for sure, but certainly not advocated.

>> In my mind, if the registry and the TLD are inextricably linked, then we
>> actually stand to lose TLDs over time. Is it such a bad thing to request
>> such a separation?
>
>Most certainly there are drawbacks to it, and they have been pointed
>out by others on here.  And there is quite simply no real
>justification for REQUIRING it.


Does that then mean that the fact that we will actually lose TLDs over time
is not a justification to require such?

-RWR