[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Eureka?

To: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Eureka?
From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 22:55:15 -0400
CC: "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>, Javier SOLA <javier@aui.es>, wg-c@dnso.org
References: <006201bee2ed$6b4d30e0$f78ad0d8@storm3.sympatico.ca>
Reply-To: mueller@syr.edu
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

Ross Wm. Rader wrote:

> In my mind, if the registry and the TLD are inextricably linked, then we
> actually stand to lose TLDs over time. Is it such a bad thing to request
> such a separation?

How so? Do we lose real estate over time? If the owner dies the titlegoes to
someone else. If the business dies it becomes an asset
that is liquidated to pay off creditors.

--
m i l t o n   m u e l l e r // m u e l l e r @ s y r . e d u
syracuse university          http://istweb.syr.edu/~mueller/

References:
- Re: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
  - From: "Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Private TLDs
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] "Public" resources -Reply
Prev by thread: RE: Re[2]: [wg-c] Eureka?
Next by thread: Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] Eureka?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread