[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] Retraction of previous proposal, re, revisted



At 23:50 12-08-99 -0700, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
>US PTO. Reason: ICANN is based in US and listens to US law first and
>foremost or California GC gets instructed to yank their charter, by the
>feds.

Dear Roeland:  Do you believe the USPTO has issued a Trademark for a domain 
name in the past?

So you expect it in the future?

Regard, BobC