Re: Re[4]: [wg-c] straw poll -- reminder

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> However, between GIVING and adding none (both of which could be accused
> somehow of restraint of trade), tendering the running of the registry
under
> periodical conditions that would be reviewed under stated conditions (no
> surprises for anyone), would seem to be the way to go.

By what logic, then, do you limit the number? By what criteria do you
select from the applicants? How do you handle the issue of a TLD that
is a famous mark?

Christopher