RE: [wg-c] missing point

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

The missing ingerient, that you seem to be implying, is enforcability.
There is none.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of A.M.
> Rutkowski
> Sent: Friday, August 20, 1999 8:34 AM
> To: Jonathan Weinberg
> Cc: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: [wg-c] missing point
>
>
> Jonathan,
>
> One key point seems missing, and relevant to the
> current dialogue:
>
> In light of the historical expansion of the DNS root zone
> by scores of new Top Level Domains per year over the
> past fifteen years unfettered by significant non-technical
> requirements, and
>
> in light of the ICANN being bound by its Articles of
> Incorporation to "enable...open entry in Internet-related
> markets, as well as applicable antitrust laws,
>
> can ICANN or any of its subsidiary organs lawfully establish
> policies that result in substantially diminishing this rate
> of increase, or restrict entry on other than the open bases
> it has been?
>
>
> --tony
>