Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> Since NSI has managed to be allowed to charge 5-17 times too much for
years
> now, pardon some of us for being a bit skeptical about cavalier attempts
to
> assert the adequacy of this approach.

Your opinion. I think NSI has been charging about half as much as they
should
be. You don't impose your opinions on the market, and I won't impose mine.
Your ideology doesn't match mine, and you're basing your requirements
going forward on your ideology.

> People and organizations use pretty much whatever means they can get away
> with maximizing the gain of their incentives, such as profit.

Which is none of your business. If you don't like it, don't patronize that
business.

I'm trying to come up with constructive contractual points to limit the
problems you see. You, on the other hand, are demanding a setup
which is not only unfair business, but is plainly impossible at this time
due to the fact that the existing registry does not have it imposed upon
itself.

You're not that stupid, Dave - therefore I can only conclude that
you're doing this deliberately to block progress.

Christopher