RE: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Since this is my second posting on this same subject, I'll keep it
short.

I agree. It's time for the "leadership" to do their job and earn their
keep.

Lead; Follow; Get out of the way.
     ... pick ONE!

> Behalf Of Kevin J. Connolly, Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 1999 6:01 AM
>
> Ya' know, when two people with notably different perceptions of the
> policy dimensions involved here (e.g., William and I) see eye to eye
> about the need to filter out the noise and get some work done, it
> seems to me to be pretty clear that the time has come for the
> leadership
> to do something:  either lead or get out of the way.
>
> I second William's motion.
>
> KJC
>
> >>> "William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net> 08/24/99 05:11AM >>>
> I am making an official motion that a splinter group be formed for the
> purposes of drawing up a set of reasonable contractual requirements
> that a registry would be required to sign on to in order to operate a
> TLD.
>
> I move that this group conduct its work on a list other than this one,
> and that those who absolutely oppose the concept that this should be a
> considered solution not be permitted to participate in this list.