[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do

To: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>, "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
From: "Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 14:02:36 -0700
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
References: <199908231814.OAA18994@manta.outremer.com><37C2DD05.17D6CDA8@syr.edu><19990824114323.B12438@songbird.com> <4.2.0.58.19990824134507.00c8b7e0@shell2.bayarea.net>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

> Apparently you missed the fact that the $9 is only recent and is the
direct
> result of long and painful pressure on NSI.  Even better is that it is
> STILL much too high a price, relative to reasonable costs.

Only in your mind.

> All of this suggests that close oversight and control of registry behavior
> IS in fact necessary.

Again, only in your mind.

To me, it suggests that close oversight and control of your eating
habits is also, in fact, necessary. Same logic.

Christopher

References:
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: John Charles Broomfield <jbroom@manta.outremer.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
  - From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by Date: Re[2]: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] breaking up (names) is hard to do
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread