Re: [wg-c] Proposal of statement to be forwarded to ICANN

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

> Under this scenario, I feel that the only thing that this WG can do
> is actually return a statement to ICANN demanding clarification and
> finalisation on the NSI situation before we can move forward. Without a
> clear standing on how NSI (registry) is supposed to act, we're engaging in
> continuous arm-flapping exercises.
>
> Comments?

Substantially agreed.

Christopher