Re: [wg-c] This workgroup list and disruptions, and a motion

["Siegfried Langenbach" <svl@nrw.net>]

if the wg does not reache concensus, we should at least list the options and 
the pros and conts. That way the NC has material to make up their mind.
siegfried

On 25 Aug 99, at 9:54, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:

> 	Keith's post raises two issues.  The first is whether we can reach
> consensus on any issues *within this working group*.  As to that: maybe
> yes, maybe no.  I've had some contacts with Javier off-list about putting
> together a possible compromise on "how many, how fast" that could be
> acceptable to the middle ground of the group.  Whether that'll work, I
> don't know, but I'd like to try.
>