[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SV: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
William,
I think you already know my position here. I am not against new gTLDs, but there is some important problems to be solved before any can be introduced. You and other on this list focus on the numbers (and yes, I know very well that "how many" is one of the questions we are supposed to answer), but "how to", "under which prerequisites" are even more important. This is not to take a step backwards, this is to build a solid foundation so that we can proceed with the questions "how many" and "which".
Regards,
Petter Rindforth
-----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
Från: William X. Walsh <william@dso.net>
Till: Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@enderborg.se>
Kopia: wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
Datum: den 6 september 1999 17:39
Ämne: Re: SV: Wrong Question (Was Re: [wg-c] compromise proposal)
>Monday, September 06, 1999, 8:19:31 AM, Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@enderborg.se> wrote:
>
>> Bill, Marilyn, and All Others,
>> I strongly agree!
>
>And would any of you object to a policy that there would be NO new
>TLDs?
>
>I think this needs to be taken into account, that these people have a
>strong interest in there being NO expansion of the TLD space, or at
>the very least a very strongly controlled expansion, though no
>expansion would be preferable.
>
>Rather than all of us going back to our original positions, as far
>from each other as they are, we ALL need to be working on areas of
>compromise, including those who have a vested interest (sometimes
>financial) in limiting expansion of namespace.
>
>I think the 6-10 plan is getting close to that compromise area.
>
>Let's not try and take a step backwards, please.
>
>--
>William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
>Email: william@dso.net Fax:(209) 671-7934
>Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
>
>Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
>http://www.dnspolicy.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss
><IDNO MEMBER) http://www.idno.org
>
>
>