RE: [wg-c] Process?

[Jean-Michel Becar <Jean-Michel.Becar@etsi.fr>]

Roeland,

So if the only solution is to go with a votebot let's go. 
 	1) Do we add any new Registry/gTLDs? YES/NO

I think we need to go small step by small step and to come up with very
narrow questions what need clear answers like yes or no.

We have to wait for Jon (but i think the problem of inactivity of this list
is due first to the time zones, and secondly to the lack of interest in
moving forward from people who seem to be afraid by opening the Domain
Space).

Regards,  


Jean-Michel Bécar
becar@etsi.fr
http://www.etsi.org
E.T.S.I. Project Manager
Tel	: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 15
Mobile 	: +33 (0)6 82 80 19 31
Fax      	: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 15



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roeland M.J. Meyer [mailto:rmeyer@mhsc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 18:30
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Cc: Robert F. Connelly
> Subject: [wg-c] Process?
> 
> 
> Strategy:
> Handle one step at a time, in order:
> Evidence of each step's completion is;
> 	1) a consensus position, based on a vote.
> 	2) Recommendation for modification of the next step (if any).
> 
> Steps:
> 	1) Do we add any new Registry/gTLDs?
> 	2) Where do we register the registry (root registry)?
> 	3) Minimum services expected from a TLD Registry.
> 	4) Minimum services expected from a gTLD.
> 	5) Minimum  business requirements for a Registry.
> 	6) How many registries?
> 	7) How many gTLDs per registry?
> 
> I firmly believe that if we follow this sequence exactly we 
> will arrive
> at some consensus on items 6 and 7 without as much pain as we are
> experiencing now. In order for this to occur, we must set up a VoteBot
> now. Whether we use Joop's polling place, or Busrow's VotBot doesn't
> matter to me, as long as we use one. Also, there are NO 
> SHORTCUTS. That
> is the very reason we are in this jam to begin with. Let us all
> excersize some self-discipline and stick to the process, whatever
> process we agree to.
> 
> Note: I expect items 3, 4, and 5 to be non-trivial.
>