Re: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.

["Jim Glanz" <bidquik@bigsky.net>]

Dear Members of WG-3:

I, too, have been watching from the sidelines.  You will see I spoke up once
and decided that there were too many chiefs in our WG to have a positive
flow of info and direction.  All the issues I had have been addressed and
addressed again and again and again.  The patient has been inspected and
dissected far too much and may not survive the life-saving operation.  It is
time to make a decision.  Draw the line in the sand on those issues that are
contested and decide that the majority on either side is what the WG works
from.  Do not allow retroactive discussion of those things that created or
caused the division between WG members once this decision is made.  It is
that simple.  We worry far too much about where the journey takes us without
ever deciding to leave.  We miss so much along the way.



Jim Glanz
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg M. <gbmax@altavista.net>
To: rmeyer@mhsc.com <rmeyer@mhsc.com>; Robert F. Connelly
<rconnell@psi-japan.com>; wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 9:49 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.


>Wonder why?
>
>I have been observing this WG for the last six weeks and it has become
>apparent that
>a consensus will never be reached.
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
>Roeland M.J. Meyer
>Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 1999 12:43 AM
>To: Robert F. Connelly; wg-c@dnso.org
>Subject: [wg-c] An amazing lack of activity.
>
>
>Did the list die?
>
>
>