Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...

[Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>]

Option 4 is an interesting one that has much to commend it.

It seems to be a truly bottom-up method of selection that does not
concentrate power in the hands of a few people who happen to spend all of
their time in ICANN and its working groups. Therefore I predict that its
chances of acceptance are minimal.

--MM

A.M. Rutkowski wrote:

> Practically, there needs to be two processes - one for
> those TLDs for which there is some form of pre-existing
> claim, and the other for those for which there is none.
>
> For the latter, the processes would seem to include:
> 1) random selection
> 2) auction
> 3) a neutral panel of judges
> 4) voting by DNS administrators
>
> Other options?
>
> --tony