RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

Wrong, this was a condition within the context. I have certainly stated
it numerous times, as have others.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On
> Behalf Of Dave
> Crocker
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 8:54 AM
> To: Milton Mueller
> Cc: Paul Garrin; wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
>
>
> At 07:13 AM 9/14/99 , Milton Mueller wrote:
> >Just want to clarify that for many of us, support of the
> 6-10 gTLD compromise
> >depends on there being 6-10 new registries authorized; i.e.,
> one for each
> >gTLD.
>
> That is a contingency that was not stated by anyone, so the
> presumtion is
> that it is a contigency that you are adding for YOUR support.
>
> d/
>
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> =-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1
> 408 246 8253
> Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1
> 408 273 6464
> 675 Spruce Drive
<http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
<mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>