Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

I have been under the assumption that 6-10 meant new
registries, not just TLDs. Milton is correct. The issue
here isn't how many TLDs, it's how many registries.
If you're comfortable with 6-10 TLDs, then let's do it
with 6-10 new registries and avoid giving business
advantage to the "chosen few."

Christopher

----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
Cc: Paul Garrin <pg@name-space.com>; <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...


> At 07:13 AM 9/14/99 , Milton Mueller wrote:
> >Just want to clarify that for many of us, support of the 6-10 gTLD
compromise
> >depends on there being 6-10 new registries authorized; i.e., one for each
> >gTLD.
>
> That is a contingency that was not stated by anyone, so the presumtion is
> that it is a contigency that you are adding for YOUR support.
>
> d/
>
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
> Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
> 675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
>