RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...

["Roeland M.J. Meyer" <rmeyer@mhsc.com>]

I might remind you that dead-lock ALSO favors an incumbent.The
difference is that, a test-bed is a process which comes to a conclusion
at a certain predictable point, a dead-lock is non-deterministic. It can
last virtually forever and has lasted over three years. Personally, I'm
getting bored with the dead-lock and would like to see some progress,
even a micron would do.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
> Milton Mueller
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 7:19 AM
> To: werner@axone.ch
> Cc: Ross Wm. Rader; Kevin J. Connolly; wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
>
>
> I enthusiastically agree with Werner.
>
> Werner Staub wrote:
>
> > That being said, I also used to believe in testbeds as a way
> > to promote progress and competition. Only from experience did
> > I learn that paradoxically they serve inertia and the dominant
> > player.
> >
>
>
>