Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...

["Jim Glanz" <bidquik@bigsky.net>]

Roeland-

I agree.  Let's get on with it!

Personal note to Roeland:   "even a micron will do."   micron is not
available in .com, .net, .org.       This is just to lighten the neverending
drudgery of this process.
-----Original Message-----
From: Roeland M.J. Meyer <rmeyer@mhsc.com>
To: Milton Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>; werner@axone.ch <werner@axone.ch>
Cc: Ross Wm. Rader <ross@ebarn.com>; Kevin J. Connolly <CONNOLLK@rspab.com>;
wg-c@dnso.org <wg-c@dnso.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 11:45 AM
Subject: RE: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...


>I might remind you that dead-lock ALSO favors an incumbent.The
>difference is that, a test-bed is a process which comes to a conclusion
>at a certain predictable point, a dead-lock is non-deterministic. It can
>last virtually forever and has lasted over three years. Personally, I'm
>getting bored with the dead-lock and would like to see some progress,
>even a micron would do.
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
>> Milton Mueller
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 7:19 AM
>> To: werner@axone.ch
>> Cc: Ross Wm. Rader; Kevin J. Connolly; wg-c@dnso.org
>> Subject: Re: [wg-c] SV: Consensus and compromises...
>>
>>
>> I enthusiastically agree with Werner.
>>
>> Werner Staub wrote:
>>
>> > That being said, I also used to believe in testbeds as a way
>> > to promote progress and competition. Only from experience did
>> > I learn that paradoxically they serve inertia and the dominant
>> > player.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>