RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )

["Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>]

Your point is interesting. I certainly didn't get the message that I could
vote" abstention". 

I do understand the other message about "what precinct" do I vote in; but we
aren't yet in a representative democracy environment... do any of those who
didn't vote, want to say whether they would have "abstained" if given the
easy option? Marilyn
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@psi-japan.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:51 PM
To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus
(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )


At 23:35 21-09-1999 -0400, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>If there were 10-25 more members than voted, then I think we have a problem
>which we should discuss amongst ourselves... are we relevant? How are we
>addressing concerns of broader constituency?

Dear Marilyn:  They have the alternative to vote an "abstention".  Then 
they would be counted.

I don't know what precinct you vote in, but if you don't vote you ain't 
counted.  BobC





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It doesn't do any good to run
if you don't start on time!"
Rev. Bruce Jones