RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (

["William X. Walsh" <william@dso.net>]

I specifically remember you electing not to vote, and hence abstaining.

This was a conscious decision you made.  

It is really annoying when someone who didn't want to vote then takes the
decision to task for not being representative of their interests.


On 22-Sep-99 Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
> 
> Your point is interesting. I certainly didn't get the message that I could
> vote" abstention". 
> 
> I do understand the other message about "what precinct" do I vote in; but we
> aren't yet in a representative democracy environment... do any of those who
> didn't vote, want to say whether they would have "abstained" if given the
> easy option? Marilyn
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert F. Connelly [mailto:rconnell@psi-japan.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 11:51 PM
> To: wg-c@dnso.org
> Subject: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus
> (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
> 
> 
> At 23:35 21-09-1999 -0400, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>>If there were 10-25 more members than voted, then I think we have a problem
>>which we should discuss amongst ourselves... are we relevant? How are we
>>addressing concerns of broader constituency?
> 
> Dear Marilyn:  They have the alternative to vote an "abstention".  Then 
> they would be counted.
> 
> I don't know what precinct you vote in, but if you don't vote you ain't 
> counted.  BobC
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "It doesn't do any good to run
> if you don't start on time!"
> Rev. Bruce Jones

--
William X. Walsh - DSo Internet Services
Email: william@dso.net  Fax:(209) 671-7934
Editor of http://www.dnspolicy.com/
 
Join DNSPolicy.com's discussion list!
http://www.dnspolicy.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/discuss
<IDNO MEMBER> http://www.idno.org