[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )

To: wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
From: "Robert F. Connelly" <rconnell@psi-japan.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 03:12:01 +0900
In-Reply-To: <6751E347E374D211857100A0C92563DC6377C4@MAILDC>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

At 13:05 22-09-1999 -0400, Cade,Marilyn S - LGA wrote:
>Dave, again, do you have any idea why I get two of all your posts? I don't
>know if others are having the same problem.

Dear Marilyn:  The reason is that Dave replied to you and the list.

What I try to do on all occasions is to delete all addresses other than the 
list.

Regards, BobC

References:
- RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
  - From: "Cade,Marilyn S - LGA" <mcade@att.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] Re: From Working Group C: Bill Semich's Position on New gTLDs
Next by Date: Voting customs: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
Prev by thread: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's New Consensus (w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] We have no Emperor: Re: The Emperor's NewConsensus(w as:Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT MESSAGE RE: WG-C )
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread