Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone

[Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>]

At 02:59 PM 9/28/1999 , John Charles Broomfield wrote:
>Come on Dave, you expect us to read and understand the new
>agreements/amendments, discuss them on this list, listen to the feedback,

Ahhh.  NOW I understand the problem.

No.  I do not expect us to treat the latest event as yet-another reason to 
distract ourselves.

The goal should be to focus on a reasonable set of first-steps for 
introducing new names and registries. The goal does not require focusing on 
other issues, such as the intricacies of the NSI-related agreements.

Yes, there are "easy" reasons to feel that such a distraction is 
justified.  But easy does not mean good or right.  Especially when they are 
held against the damage of yet-more delay.

In fact the ready concurrence about further delay strongly suggests the 
detached role most participants really have in this drama.

d/

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>