Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

This couldn't be further from the truth. The fact remains that this
represents a significant change to the current landscape. Further, it was
quite unexpected given recent events. Time must be taken in order to
evaluate the relevance of these events and how they might, or might not,
affect our position and statements.

-RWR
----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 6:13 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone


> At 02:59 PM 9/28/1999 , John Charles Broomfield wrote:
> >Come on Dave, you expect us to read and understand the new
> >agreements/amendments, discuss them on this list, listen to the
feedback,
>
> Ahhh.  NOW I understand the problem.
>
> No.  I do not expect us to treat the latest event as yet-another reason
to
> distract ourselves.
>
> The goal should be to focus on a reasonable set of first-steps for
> introducing new names and registries. The goal does not require focusing
on
> other issues, such as the intricacies of the NSI-related agreements.
>
> Yes, there are "easy" reasons to feel that such a distraction is
> justified.  But easy does not mean good or right.  Especially when they
are
> held against the damage of yet-more delay.
>
> In fact the ready concurrence about further delay strongly suggests the
> detached role most participants really have in this drama.
>
> d/
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
> Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
> 675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>