Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone

["Ross Wm. Rader" <ross@ebarn.com>]

At the most basic levels, perhaps. But the documents contain much more than
that from an operational level. Too much in fact to digest prior to the
deadlines. I have a a dedicated team working on this and we will be lucky
to have a preliminary opinion formed prior to Friday - never mind
coalescing a formal position statement....


----- Original Message -----
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
To: Ross Wm. Rader <ross@ebarn.com>
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 10:48 PM
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Motion to Postpone


> At 07:59 PM 9/28/1999 , Ross Wm. Rader wrote:
> >This couldn't be further from the truth. The fact remains that this
> >represents a significant change to the current landscape. Further, it
was
> >quite unexpected given recent events. Time must be taken in order to
> >evaluate the relevance of these events and how they might, or might not,
> >affect our position and statements.
>
> In fact short of NSI pursuing a frivolous lawsuit, in the hope of getting
a
> sympathetic judge, the announced arrangement has always seemed the most
> likely, starting all the way back to almost 3 years ago.
>
> d/
>
>
> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> Dave Crocker                                         Tel: +1 408 246 8253
> Brandenburg Consulting                               Fax: +1 408 273 6464
> 675 Spruce Drive                             <http://www.brandenburg.com>
> Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA                 <mailto:dcrocker@brandenburg.com>