Re: [wg-c] position papers

[bill@mail.nic.nu (J. William Semich)]

Can you please remind us all of who posted these 8 position papers and the
dates they were posted, so we can be sure we have reviewed them all?

Thanks,

Bill Semich
.NU Domain Ltd

At 11:21 PM 10/14/99 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>Well, time is passing, so let's do this:
>
>	Every position-paper drafter who wants his or her position paper included
>as part of the WG-C interim report should submit a final version to me by
>the end of Monday, along with the names of signatories (and a notation, as
>to each, whether he or she is a member of the WG).
>
>	My inclination, right now, is that the interim report (incorporating the
>position papers) should be a plain text document, given that (1) that would
>simplify distribution of the document for public comment; and (2) all but
>one of the eight people who've sent position papers to the list submitted
>them as text documents in any event.  Roeland, can you live with this?
>Javier -- your thoughts?  Does anybody else have strong feelings?
>
>Jon
>
>
>Jonathan Weinberg
>co-chair, WG-C
>weinberg@msen.com
>