Re: [wg-c] position papers

[Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>]

Craig Simon <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01837.html>
Roeland Meyer <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01914.html>
contains urls
Milton Mueller <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01915.html>
Caroline Chicoine <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01916.html>
Jon Weinberg <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01922.html>
Eric Brunner <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01958.html>
Kent Crispin (revised version)
<http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01960.html>
Paul Stahura <http://www.dnso.org/wgroups/wg-c/Archives/msg01995.html>.

Jon


At 12:14 AM 10/15/99 -0400, J. William Semich wrote:
>Can you please remind us all of who posted these 8 position papers and the
>dates they were posted, so we can be sure we have reviewed them all?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bill Semich
>.NU Domain Ltd
>
>At 11:21 PM 10/14/99 -0400, Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>>Well, time is passing, so let's do this:
>>
>>	Every position-paper drafter who wants his or her position paper included
>>as part of the WG-C interim report should submit a final version to me by
>>the end of Monday, along with the names of signatories (and a notation, as
>>to each, whether he or she is a member of the WG).
>>
>>	My inclination, right now, is that the interim report (incorporating the
>>position papers) should be a plain text document, given that (1) that would
>>simplify distribution of the document for public comment; and (2) all but
>>one of the eight people who've sent position papers to the list submitted
>>them as text documents in any event.  Roeland, can you live with this?
>>Javier -- your thoughts?  Does anybody else have strong feelings?
>>
>>Jon
>>
>>
>>Jonathan Weinberg
>>co-chair, WG-C
>>weinberg@msen.com
>>
>
>