[wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Ken Stubbs

[Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>]

>From: "Ken Stubbs" <kstubbs@dninet.net>
>To: <wg-c@dnso.org>, "Eric Brunner" <brunner@world.std.com>
>Subject: Re: [wg-c] lock-in and Delegation models
>Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:39:53 -0500
>
>i am here...
>ask away
>
>ken stubbs
>chairman - CORE
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>
>To: <wg-c@dnso.org>
>Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 12:53 PM
>Subject: Re: [wg-c] lock-in and Delegation models
>
>
>>
>> Mr. Walsh informs me that he will not entertain discussions to which I am
>> a party. As his claim concerning CORE pricing is trivially verified by the
>> simple expedient of asking CORE, there is no loss on the first topic. The
>> second is more problematic, as the crux of the claim appears to be that
>> Mr. Walsh rejects the position that ICANN has discretionary capacity, but
>> he is hardly unique in taking such a position, if that is in fact his, and
>> the core issue.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Eric