Mail Thread Index
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] lock-in,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] lock-in,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] lock-in,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Please explain to my clients....,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] Administrivia,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] The Hooker Flap (was: URGENT silliness),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] scope and TLDs (was: proprietary),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Delegation models (was: proprietary TLDs),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Nomination Procedures for the Chair of the General Assembly (GA),
DNSO Listadmin
Re: [wg-c] lock-in and Delegation models,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Ken Stubbs,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Some nagging questions not on the WG-C agenda,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Re: Proprietary TLDs (was: scope and TLDs),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] FW: Re: [IFWP] Esther Dyson's reply,
William X. Walsh
[wg-c] Creation of the .ps domain,
Martin B. Schwimmer
[wg-c] .EU domain?,
Attyross
Re: [wg-c] Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?,
John Charles Broomfield
[wg-c] Re: Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] bounced message, forwarded for Ken Stubbs,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Robert F. Connelly
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
dwmaher
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Mark C. Langston
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Craig Simon
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Joseph Friedman
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Richard Lindsay
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
katie
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Kilnam Chon
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Michael D. Palage
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Ann-Catherine Andersson
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Hal Lubsen
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Siegfried Langenbach
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Harold Feld
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] The consensus call..,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Timothy Denton
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Andrew Lutts
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Paul Stahura
Message not available
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Dongman Lee
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
pg
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Penman, Ian
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Cohen, Tod
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Cohen, Tod
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Olivier Kozlowski
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Attyross
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Chicoine, Caroline
[wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
john.c.lewis
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Annie Renard
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Anthony Lupo
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Jean-Michel Becar
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Rita M. Odin
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Younjung Park
AW: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Broich, Astrid
[wg-c] Consensus Vote,
WICG
VB: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Petter Rindforth
[wg-c] Consensus call,
Philip Sheppard
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL,
Justin McCarthy
- [wg-c] Consensus call,
Harold Feld
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Simon Higgs
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Simon Higgs
- RE: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Josh Elliott
- RE: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Jonathan Weinberg
- RE: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Simon Higgs
- RE: [wg-c] Consensus call,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
- [wg-c] list administration,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Alex Kamantauskas
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Simon Higgs
History rewriting (Re: [wg-c] Consensus call),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Simon Higgs
RE: [wg-c] Consensus call,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] The Vote,
BEARSEVEN
[wg-c] Early case under new cybersquat law,
Attyross
Re: [wg-c] ballot stuffing,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
[wg-c] Try one first,
Attyross
[wg-c] bounced message, for Ken Stubbs,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Administrivia (11/12),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Initial Numbers,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Initial Numbers,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Initial Numbers,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on procedural grounds,
bob broxton
Re: [wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on procedural grounds,
Dave Crocker
[wg-c] The Broxton Cypher (Sunday Comics),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Eva Frölich ,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [registrars] Clarification on Working Group C Vote; [wg-c] IMPORTANT: CONSENSUS CALL,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] re: wg-c consensus call,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] A question about .INT,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Re: A question about .INT,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Re: A question about .INT (Fwd for Mike StJohns),
Eric Brunner
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[wg-c] Re: A question about .INT (Fwd for Mike StJohns),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Unique DNS Root Last Call (DNSIND WG),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] reposted for Brian Carpenter,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Tonight's teleconference.,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] Administrativia,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Consensus "elsewhere"...,
Ross Wm. Rader
[wg-c] RE: [wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Eva Frölich,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] three votes sent to me that may not have gone to the entire list,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Resend: Some nagging questions not on the WG-C agenda,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Register.com auto-reg's TMs in all domains, ICANN a customer,
Mark C. Langston
[wg-c] Adding (just under) a Million TLDs to the DNS Root,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Re: Adding (just under) a Million TLDs to the DNS Root (Fwd for Paul Vixie),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] reposted for Paul Vixie,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] reposted for Paul Mockapetris,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] factoid,
Kent Crispin
[wg-c] On reaching consensus, and the purpose of the testbed,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] scheduling note,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Change that AT&T vote to "yes",
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] Cyberlaw Course,
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
[wg-c] Re: VOTE,
Eva Frölich
[wg-c] Administrivia (Voting closes today),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root,
DNSO Listadmin
Re: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root,
Dave Crocker
[wg-c] [council] Working Group C Co-Chair,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] To the Abstainers,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Consensus Vote - yes,
Kilnam Chon
[wg-c] Chicken. Egg. Theory. Reality.,
WICG
[wg-c] repeat post,
Mark Measday
[wg-c] Administrivia (pentultimate),
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root,
Karl Auerbach
[wg-c] Administrivia (final),
Eric Brunner
RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] consensus call results,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] consensus call results,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] consensus call results,
A.M. Rutkowski
[wg-c] consensus call results,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] thanks,
Jonathan Weinberg
RE: [wg-b] RE: [wg-c] IAB Technical Comment on the Unique,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] IAB comment,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] Re: IAB comment,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
Paul Garrin
RE: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
Re: [wg-c] reposted for Harald Tveit Alvestrand,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] One summary of NO voting rationals offered,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] bounced, reposted for Paul Garrin,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] .EU news,
Attyross
Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Mark C. Langston
RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Mark C. Langston
RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Karl Auerbach
[wg-c] Re: Suggestions,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: [wg-c] Re: Suggestions,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] Re: Suggestions,
Ross Wm. Rader
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Martin B. Schwimmer
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Karl Auerbach
[wg-c] Specific TLD Proposals,
Martin B. Schwimmer
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Dave Crocker
RE: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] Consensus,
Kent Crispin
[wg-c] Re: One summary of NO voting rationals [PPC and Rita's],
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Re: One summary of NO voting rationals [Philip Sheppard's],
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] reposted for Tony Rutkowski,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] reposted for Paul Garrin,
Jonathan Weinberg
RE: Suggestions (Re: [wg-c] Schwimmer Post From Last Week ),
Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
[wg-c] chartered tlds,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] Multiple Root Distractions,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] Re: Suggestions,
martys
[wg-c] reposted for Richard S. Campbell,
Jonathan Weinberg
<Possible follow-up(s)>
FW: [wg-c] reposted for Richard S. Campbell,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] scheduling note, redux,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
J. William Semich
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Werner Staub
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs),
J. William Semich
Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs),
John Charles Broomfield
Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs),
A.M. Rutkowski
Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs),
Dave Crocker
Re: Asian Alternative Roots (was RE: [wg-c] new TLDs),
J. William Semich
[wg-c] I lost count,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
J. William Semich
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Ross Wm. Rader
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Robert F. Connelly
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Harold Feld
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Martin B. Schwimmer
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Mark C. Langston
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
<Possible follow-up(s)>
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Sportack, Mark A, CSCIO
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] New TLDs,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Paul Garrin
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Richard
[wg-c] new TLDs,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Andrew Lutts
RE: [wg-c] new TLDs,
Roeland Meyer
[wg-c] The People's Choice of TLDs,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] Contribution from denominated ICANN CTO,
A.M. Rutkowski
[wg-c] A little less noise please (I'm trying to drink),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] fwd draft-hollenbeck-rrp-00.txt,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] I'm sure you all can guess ...,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] current sld stats,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] The fruits of confessional conflict (Sunday after Solstice),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] wg-c tasks please,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] well, I'm back,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] more sld length stats,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] Chartered gTLD .RX or the like.,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] NSI's MILLENNIUM SPECIAL OFFER,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] year2000.com sold for $10 million,
Attyross
[wg-c] Food for thought,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] FW: Eeek - .NU Domains using Ö, Ä, Ĺ, Ü, Ń - And More,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] CNET.com - News - The Net - Teen Magazine clashes with porn site,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] Support for Position Paper A,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] AOL merges with Time Warner,
Attyross
[wg-c] comment deadline for WG-C interim report,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] WG-C Position Paper Comments,
Ross Wm. Rader
[wg-c] Comments,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Comments,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] non-member submission, forwarded for Michael Heltzer,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] comment summary,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] WIPO: Use of Trademarks on the Internet: Issues Paper,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Where we go from here,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Court rules that TLDs "could indeed" be protected speech,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Keith Gymer
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Harold Feld
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
J. William Semich
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Eric Brunner
- RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Eric Brunner
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Eric Brunner
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Dave Crocker
Posting to the list is enough! Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Keith Gymer
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Bret A. Fausett
RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Kevin J. Connolly
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
A.M. Rutkowski
- RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Milton Mueller
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Jonathan Weinberg
- [wg-c] ICANN Power,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Joseph Friedman
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Jonathan Weinberg
- RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Josh Elliott
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Mark Measday
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Patrick Greenwell
RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Josh Elliott
Re: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Milton Mueller
RE: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU,
Penman, Ian
[wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Jay Parker
Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Harold Feld
Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Kent Crispin
RE: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] The moment of history,
Harold Feld
Re: [wg-c] The moment of history,
A.M. Rutkowski
[wg-c] The moment of distraction,
Dave Crocker
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] .eu and the notion of regional TLDs,
Dave Crocker
[wg-c] forwarded for Jay Parker,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Adding EU,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] Enouth NSI/IANA/ICANN Control,
Robert Waters
Re: [wg-c] Enouth NSI/IANA/ICANN Control - Free,
Robert Waters
[wg-c] The moment of distraction,
Dave Crocker
[wg-c] Re: [ga] new WG on chartered/sponsored TLDs,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Jonathan Weinberg
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Eric Brunner
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Joop Teernstra
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Dongman Lee
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Harold Feld
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Josh Elliott
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL- responses,
Keith Gymer
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Raul Echeberria
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Paul Stahura
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- [wg-c] straw poll,
Jonathan Weinberg
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Winer, Jonathan
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL - response,
Penman, Ian
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Philip Sheppard
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Winer, Jonathan
- RE: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Tim Vienneau
- Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Philip Sheppard
- [wg-c] STRAW POLL,
Petter Rindforth
- [wg-c] straw poll,
Mark Measday
[wg-c] Straw poll response,
Milton Mueller
[Fwd: [wg-c] Commission Working paper on the creation of .EU],
Mark Measday
[wg-c] where we go from here, redux,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] nine principles for domain names,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] nine principles for domain names,
Karl Auerbach
[wg-c] Sheppard/Kleiman in WG-B,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] test,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
[wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Bret A. Fausett
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Mark C. Langston
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Bret A. Fausett
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Karl Auerbach
RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Winer, Jonathan
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Winer, Jonathan
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Milton Mueller
RE: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Paul Stahura
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] test delete,
Joseph Friedman
[wg-c] Cairo meeting?,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Cairo meeting?,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Cairo meeting?,
Mark C. Langston
[wg-c] Questions,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] reposted for Tim Vienneau,
Jonathan Weinberg
[Fwd: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names: sense and sensibility?],
Mark Measday
Re: Meaningful names and IP addresses (Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names),
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] Suggested gTLD,
Anders Berg-Hansen
Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names v5,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] Reply to straw poll,
dwmaher
[wg-c] A brief note on linguists...,
Mark C. Langston
[wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nine principles fordomain names],
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] Cairo meeting,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Request .eur or .euro,
Edler & Nebel Softwareentwicklung
Re: [wg-c] Our mission,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re: nineprinciplesfor domain names],
Kevin J. Connolly
RE: [wg-c] Specific Implementation Proposal: [Was:Re:nineprinciplesfor domain names],
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] forwarded for Eric Menge,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] straw poll update, possible consensus calls, and our mission,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] FW: Infosecurity @ White House,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] WGC Position Paper,
Paul Stahura
[wg-c] straw poll vote,
katie
Re: [wg-c] Some reactions to the principles v5,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v6,
Philip Sheppard
(fwd) Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL VOTE,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] straw poll results,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Comments on the 8 principles,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7,
Philip Sheppard
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v7,
Philip Sheppard
Re: [wg-c] Principles for domain names v8,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] .eu,
Edler & Nebel Softwareentwicklung
[wg-c] WG-B,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] Status of WG-C: Cairo Presentation,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT,
Jonathan Weinberg
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT,
Josh Elliott
<Possible follow-up(s)>
re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT,
Kendall Dawson
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT,
Rothnie, Warwick
RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT,
T Vienneau
[wg-c] FW: ADNS Press Release,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
<Possible follow-up(s)>
RE: [wg-c] FW: ADNS Press Release,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] reposted for Kendall Dawson,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] General Assembly Cairo Meeting on 8 March 2000, agenda,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] Kendall Dawson's thoughts, protection of famous names and marks,
Winer, Jonathan
[wg-c] DNSO Names Council Cairo Meeting on 8 March 2000 - agenda,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] forwarded for Kendall Dawson,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] CPT/EI letter on TLDs,
James Love
[wg-c] voting on TLDs,
James Love
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Patrick Greenwell
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Patrick Greenwell
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Dave Crocker
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Dave Crocker
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
James Love
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Paul Garrin
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Kevin J. Connolly
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Winer, Jonathan
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Rothnie, Warwick
RE: [wg-c] voting on TLDs,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
[wg-c] non-consensus call,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout,
Jonathan Weinberg
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout,
Kendall Dawson
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout,
T Vienneau
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in the initial rollout,
Mark Measday
[wg-c] "process",
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] vote?,
Justin McCarthy
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs in theinitial rollout,
Kevin J. Connolly
re: [wg-c] Re: vote?,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C....",
bob broxton
[wg-c] RE: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI,
William X. Walsh
Message not available
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C....",
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI,
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] NY Times Online 3/9,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] WG-C Report,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] No Specific Recs,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] forwarded for Mark Measday,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Reply to co-chair (was: CONSENSUS CALL -- selecting the gTLDs ...),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles"),
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "principles"),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] WG-C List administrivia,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Paul Garrin
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Kent Crispin
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] "within the process",
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] "within the process",
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Paul Garrin
RE: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] historical trivia (getting to the Shepperd/Kleiman "p,
Paul Garrin
[wg-c] about the consensus call,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call,
Milton Mueller
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] about the consensus call,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] convenience,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] WG-C List administrivia (revised),
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] INT domain,
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] Reposted for Roeland Meyer,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] The scope of gTLDs,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language,
Jonathan Weinberg
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] WG Report: deadlines and draft language,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Deadlines and Draft Language,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] Restatement of wg-c discussion,
Mark Measday
RE: [wg-c] about the consensus call; How do we get a degreeof,
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] Exclusions,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Josh Elliott
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Dave Crocker
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Josh Elliott
[wg-c] getting work done, versus not,
Dave Crocker
RE: [wg-c] getting work done, versus not,
Josh Elliott
Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Kent Crispin
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Josh Elliott
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Exclusions,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Exclusions,
Eric Brunner
RE: [wg-c] Exclusions,
T Vienneau
RE: [wg-c] application documents requirements,
T Vienneau
[wg-c] further exclusions/surity insterments,
Rick H Wesson
No Subject,
T Vienneau
[wg-c] Wesson draft - (gTLD Application Requirements),
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] current version of WG-C report,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Progress,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] reposted for Bret Fausett,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] WG-C report -- final version,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Jonathan Weinberg
- Re: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Kyle J Taylor
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- RE: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Rothnie, Warwick
- SV: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Petter Rindforth
- Re: SV: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Anthony Lupo
- Re: [wg-c] OK, *really* final version,
Mariah Garvey
[wg-c] reposted for Bob Broxton,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Report,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] Silent and Reflective, Otherwise Active, or simply Dead or Zombie,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] terms of Registry license,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] whois - opperational issues && new gTLDs,
Rick H Wesson
RE: [wg-c] Re: your mail,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Re: your mail,
Eric Brunner
RE: [wg-c] Re: your mail,
Winer, Jonathan
[wg-c] thanks for your work.,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
[wg-c] list etiquette,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Important -- voting on WG report,
BEARSEVEN
[wg-c] Vote on WG-C Report,
Tony Linares
[wg-c] distributing gTLD whois,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Rick H Wesson
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Robert F. Connelly
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Ross Wm. Rader
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
[wg-c] Shared TLD and shared roots?,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
[wg-c] Re: Shared TLD and shared roots?,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Ross Wm. Rader
RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Ross Wm. Rader
RE: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Robert F. Connelly
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Joop Teernstra
Re: [wg-c] more on non-shared gTLDs,
Milton Mueller
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[wg-c] more on non-shaired gTLDs,
Justin McCarthy
[wg-c] reposted for Eric Brunner,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] FTC report on "lock-in",
William X. Walsh
[wg-c] Vote,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] A plea,
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] The IAB statement on sharing DNS domain registires,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] The IAB statement on sharing DNS domain registires,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[wg-c] Vote on WG report,
Joop Teernstra
[wg-c] Administrivia (revision 1),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] official vote,
Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
[wg-c] voting,
Siegfried Langenbach
[wg-c] Yes vote on report,
Joseph Friedman
[wg-c] Vote on WG report (part one),
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
[wg-c] wg-c vote,
dwmaher
[wg-c] Administrivia (long form),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] re: Administrivia,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] VOTE WGC REPORT,
Chicoine, Caroline
[wg-c] Administrivia (@10pm EST),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] WG-C report -- final tally,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Registrant thresholds (was: more on non-shared gTLDs),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Ambler/Meuller/Walsh/Meyers on .NAA,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] IPv6,
Martin B. Schwimmer
[wg-c] non-commercial TLDS,
James Love
[wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report,
megacz
Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report,
James Love
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report,
Paul Garrin
RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not in 10-23 report,
Andrew Dalgleish
[wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Dave Crocker
- RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
david
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
david
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Bret A. Fausett
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Patrick Greenwell
RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Robert F. Connelly
RE: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Christopher Ambler
Message not availableRe: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Robert F. Connelly
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Martin B. Schwimmer
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Mark C. Langston
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Eric Brunner
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Choosing the intial testbed,
Kevin J. Connolly
[wg-c] Texts of wg-c and wg-b reports.,
Robert F. Connelly
correction: Re: [wg-c] Texts of wg-c and wg-b reports.,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] re: Choosing the intial testbed,
Kendall Dawson
Re: [wg-c] re: Choosing the intial testbed,
James Love
[wg-c] Market Research and Public Awareness,
Greg Schuckman
[wg-c] ICANN June meeting and new gTLDs,
Rothnie, Warwick
[wg-c] list rules,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Re: [wg-c[ Choosing the intial testbed,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Funding for NGOs in Cairo (was: Chosing Initial Testbed),
Harold Feld
[wg-c] Domain Names Want To Be Free,
Martin B. Schwimmer
[wg-c] The Hooker Flap Redoux,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Application Requirements?,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] Application Requirements,
Kendall Dawson
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Christopher Ambler
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
John Charles Broomfield
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Christopher Ambler
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
- RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Mikki Barry
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Mikki Barry
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Martin B. Schwimmer
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Rick H Wesson
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
RE: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
John Charles Broomfield
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[wg-c] Application Requirements,
Kendall Dawson
Re: [wg-c] Application Requirements,
Attyross
[wg-c] pointer to Sheppard/Kleiman princilials,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] Re: [wg-b] Creation of Famous List,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] Re: Application Requirements,
Attyross
[wg-c] Overlimits,
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [wg-c] Sheppard/Kleiman princilials,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] hypothetical registry application,
Richard
[wg-c] Working Group C agenda,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Working Group C agenda,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] deadlines,
James Love
[wg-c] Proposal for new TLDs,
James Love
[wg-c] flawed process or flawed principles,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] why not name.space style:,
Jonathan E. Graehl
[wg-c] OFF TOPIC: Jamie Love on Microsoft settlement,
Martin B. Schwimmer
[wg-c] RE: History & current events (RE: [ga] About GA membership again......),
Roeland M. J. Meyer
Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report],
Richard
Re: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently not i n 10-23 report,
Eric Brunner
Re: [Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently],
Richard
Re: [Re: [Re: [RE: [wg-c] Excellent suggestion from slashdot -- apparently]],
Richard
RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda],
Winer, Jonathan
RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda],
Andrew Dalgleish
RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda],
Jean-Michel Becar
RE: [wg-c] S/K principles [Was: Working Group C agenda],
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
- [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Mark C. Langston
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
RE: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Joe Kelsey
RE: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Alex Kamantauskas
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Simon Higgs
[wg-c] re: S/K principles,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] Invitation for Public Comments on New gTLDs/Famous Trade-Marks,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] Guidelines for the initial rollout of new gTLDs,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] S/K Principles,
Justin McCarthy
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Philip Sheppard
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Kendall Dawson
- RE: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Winer, Jonathan
- RE: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Winer, Jonathan
- [wg-c] S/K principles,
Jonathan Weinberg
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Philip Sheppard
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Philip Sheppard
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Eric Brunner
- RE: [wg-c] S/K principles,
T Vienneau
- Re: [wg-c] S/K principles,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] Guidelines,
Kendall Dawson
[wg-c] forwarded for Manon Ress,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Another gTLD starts up,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] Two Para D&I Summary (PPE),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Ambler's take [was: Two Para etc, ],
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Moderate earthquake in Japan.,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] Re: [Nc-tlds] ICANN's Working Group C discussions on "Guidelines for the initialrollout of new gTLDs",
Milton Mueller
[wg-c] deployment and implementation summary position paper D,
Kent Crispin
[wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Paul Stahura
- RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Kent Crispin
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Simon Higgs
- Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Karl Auerbach
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
John Charles Broomfield
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Simon Higgs
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Kent Crispin
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Craig Simon
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
James Love
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Christopher Ambler
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
[wg-c] The Issues At Hand,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] RE: The Issues At Hand,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] The Issues At Hand,
John Charles Broomfield
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Alex Kamantauskas
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Bret A. Fausett
RE: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
William X. Walsh
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Paul Garrin
Re: [wg-c] Pre-sold TLDs,
Paul Garrin
Re: [wg-c] Proposed gTLDs: The IAHC Seven,
Dave Crocker
[wg-c] Mark's Proposal,
Christopher Ambler
Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal,
Simon Higgs
RE: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] Mark's Proposal,
John Charles Broomfield
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Dave Crocker
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
James Seng
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
John Charles Broomfield
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Bret A. Fausett
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Dongman Lee
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Karl Auerbach
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
William X. Walsh
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Jerry Yap
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Joe Kelsey
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Alex Kamantauskas
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Josh Elliott
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Keith Gymer
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Patrick Greenwell
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Kilnam Chon
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Craig Simon
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Greg Schuckman
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Joop Teernstra
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Annie Renard
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
david
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Robert F. Connelly
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Rick H Wesson
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Raul Echeberria
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Ann-Catherine Andersson
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
YJ Park
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Paul Stahura
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Kevin J. Connolly
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Justin McCarthy
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Philip Sheppard
- Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Daiva Tamulioniene
- [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2",
Bret A. Fausett
- [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
Bret A. Fausett
- Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
Eric Brunner
- Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
John Charles Broomfield
- Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
Eric Brunner
Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
Bret A. Fausett
Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2" (More),
Simon Higgs
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Jean-Michel Becar
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
T Vienneau
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Penman, Ian
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
katie
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Kit Winter
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Kroon, Richard
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Andrew Dalgleish
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
J. William Semich
Re: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
[wg-c] re: CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT,
Jeff Shrewsbury Info Avenue
[wg-c] "It Won't Work",
Dave Crocker
Re: [[wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS -- THIS IS IT],
Richard Campbell
[wg-c] Convenience II,
Justin McCarthy
Re: [wg-c] Please Explain "No on 1, Yes on 2",
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] I agree with Shuckman,
Timothy Denton
[wg-c] I-D ACTION:draft-iab-i18n-dns-00.txt (fwd),
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] wg-c list management,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Reminder,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Administrivia (041400.1),
Eric Brunner
RE: [wg-c] CONSENSUS CALLS,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
[wg-c] Administrivia (041500),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] TUCOWS.com Comments on IPC Sunrise Proposal,
Ross Wm. Rader
[wg-c] Time to comment on IPC sunrise proposal,
James Love
[wg-c] Re: [wg-b] Revised IPC Proposal,
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] reposted for Hal Lubsen,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Administrivia (041700),
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] Wampumpeag.org Comments on WG-B Work Product,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] more list adminstration,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] 1447PDT 4/18, DNSO NC made all our work irrelevant,
Mark C. Langston
[wg-c] nsi proposes to create new gTLds,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] That was fun,
Christopher Ambler
[wg-c] NC Statement on new gTLDs,
Jonathan Weinberg
Re: [Re: [wg-c] nsi proposes to create new gTLds],
Richard Campbell
[wg-c] Adios,
Tony Linares
[wg-c] Respecting the process,
Milton Mueller
Re: [wg-c] Respecting the process,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
Re: [wg-c] Respecting the process,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] Give NSI .shop and take back .com,
James Love
<Possible follow-up(s)>
Re: [wg-c] Give NSI .shop and take back .com,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] DNSO Names Council Statement on new gTLDs,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] Call for comments on WG-B formal report, ending 10 May 2000,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] Tuesday's NC meeting,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] NSI's "survey" shows most don't want 6 to 10 new TLDs,
James Love
[wg-c] FYI: Slashdot,
Simon Higgs
[wg-c] for the NC,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Re: for the NC,
Elisabeth Porteneuve
[wg-c] disbanding,
Rick H Wesson
[wg-c] Sunday Reflections,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] FYI - CNN article that mentions WG-C,
Alex Kamantauskas
Re: [wg-c] WG C,
Philip Sheppard
[wg-c] Yokohama DNSO agenda,
DNSO Listadmin
[wg-c] Number of participants in the DNSO mailing lists over time,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] RE: Sunset for sunrise,
Roeland Meyer \(E-mail\)
[wg-c] Subscriptions to the DNSO General Assembly voting registry,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] All you need to know about life;-},
Robert F. Connelly
[wg-c] FW: [ga] court curbs icann,
Roeland Meyer \(E-mail\)
[wg-c] Formalizing Voting Procedures for the DNSO GA,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] ICANN - New TLD Consultation document,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] Call for comments on WG-E final report,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and Outreach for pu...,
YJ Park
[wg-c] Re: [council] Draft final report of WG-E Global Awareness and Outreach,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] 50 grand to enter the pagent,
Eric Brunner
[wg-c] RE: Give me a plan.,
Roeland M.J. Meyer
[wg-c] Call for Nominations for the election of ICANN Board member,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] firms that provide services for new TLDs,
James Love
[wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?,
Robert F. Connelly
<Possible follow-up(s)>
[wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?,
Robert F. Connelly
RE: [wg-c] How's this for spamming by a RegistraR?,
Cade,Marilyn S - LGA
RE: [wg-c] telephone numbers in domain names.,
Jean-Michel Becar
[wg-c] three bounced messages,
Jonathan Weinberg
[wg-c] Agenda suggestions for the next NC teleconferences,
DNSO Secretariat
[wg-c] forwarded for Judith Oppenheimer,
Jonathan Weinberg
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.3.3