[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[wg-c] ballot stuffing
Looks like the trademark community needed about a day to get organized.
For the first day of wg-c (re-)balloting on the matter of 6-10 new gTLDs ,
regular participants responded readily and overwhelmingly
positively. Notable is that the support is from the full range of regular
participants, no matter how strongly they might have disagreed about other
matters, in the past.
Yesterday and today we see a large number of new names, many voting
no. Most appear to have affiliations that suggest an underlying concern
about brand protection. Those adding comments to their votes raise very
old issues, thereby suggesting entirely entrenched positions and no
willingness to compromise. (If they are so concerned about the points they
raise, why did they not participate in any of the many months of discussion?)
This highlights the difficulties in the process. An open process based on
rough consensus requires a broad commitment towards making forward
progress. A well-organized community can too readily side-track or block work.
d/
=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@brandenburg.com>
Brandenburg Consulting <www.brandenburg.com>
Tel: +1.408.246.8253, Fax: +1.408.273.6464
675 Spruce Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA