[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: 63/67 characters? Was RE: [wg-c] Consensus vote - "no" on pr




> The author of that comment was referring to recent news that a registrar was going to
> permit registration of second level names up to 67 characters in length

That would be a yuck... since DNS can not accomodate DNS names with labels
in excess of 63 octets in the packet format.

		--karl--