[wg-c] bounced message, reposted for Eva Frölich

[Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>]

>Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:55:44 +0100
>To: wg-c@dnso.org
>From: Eva =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fr=F6lich?= <info@nic-se.se>
>Subject: Re: [wg-c] Are cc:TLDs included in our Charter?
>
>.eu or not .eu is a very sensitive discussion and the final word is not 
>said yet.
>People I been talking too is sure that the question sooner or later will 
>fall on the table of the DNSO and probably then WG C. At the same time the 
>different politicians within the EU wan´t so have a say and I wouldn´t be 
>astonished if even politicians outside EU has a standpoint (there might be 
>more regions - geographic, cutural, sociopolitic etc) in the world.
>
>For your information there has been ongoing discussions within ITU for the 
>last 5 years on having a regional countrycode for telephony services within 
>Europe (a question driven by the Commission). ITU  has though got lost in 
>the definition of "region"......
>
>/ Eva
>
>
>
>
>
>At 18:35 1999-12-10 -0500, A.M. Rutkowski wrote:
>>Hi Elisabeth,
>>
>>>==> To keep the record straight: .EU is not *regional*,
>>>     but European Union, it is a reserved code
>>>     (http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/)
>>
>>Of course, it's regional - unless the European Union
>>somehow became a country.  Indeed, it's apparently classified
>>as an "exceptional reservation" as described at:
>>http://www.din.de/gremien/nas/nabd/iso3166ma/reserved.html
>>
>>I say apparently, because neither the list of reserved
>>code elements, nor EU's category is publicly available.
>>It's safe to presume, however, that it's not likely to
>>be either "transitional" or "indeterminate."
>>
>>d'accord?
>>
>>-tony
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Eva Frölich
>e-mail:	eva@nic-se.se
>NIC-SE, Box 5774, 114 87 Stockholm
>
>http://www.nic-se.se
>
>