RE: SV: [wg-c] ballot stuffing

["Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rod@cyberspaces.org>]

Please do join in. What are the foreseeable problems that cannot be resolved
by ICANN and the Internet community?

-----Original Message-----
From: Cade,Marilyn S - LGA [mailto:mcade@att.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 9:56 AM
To: 'Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.'; Barbara Dooley; Petter Rindforth; Rita M.
Odin
Subject: RE: SV: [wg-c] ballot stuffing


Rod, can I join you and Barbara in this particular discussion? Not to butt
in... but I don't think there is any clear path of how to deal with many of
the problems we foresee... that may not be what Barbara Dooley means though.
Marilyn

-----Original Message-----
From: Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M. [mailto:rod@cyberspaces.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 1999 3:24 AM
To: Barbara Dooley; Petter Rindforth; Rita M. Odin; wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: RE: SV: [wg-c] ballot stuffing


what are the "current circumstances"?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-wg-c@dnso.org [mailto:owner-wg-c@dnso.org]On Behalf Of
Barbara Dooley
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 1999 8:24 PM
To: Petter Rindforth; Rita M. Odin; wg-c@dnso.org
Subject: Re: SV: [wg-c] ballot stuffing


I would like to reinforce the position that the number is secondary to
answering the questions concerning operational environment, IP and
trademark resolution, implementation, and assessment. CIX would have to
vote "NO" under current circumstances.

Barbara

Barbara A. Dooley
President
Commercial Internet eXchange Association
1301 Connecticut Ave NW Fifth Floor
Washington DC 20036
v. 703-709-8200
f. 703-709-5249
<http://www.cix.org>



At 07:45 AM 12/13/99 +0100, Petter Rindforth wrote:
>I echo Rita (it's no need to say anything yourselves, when others do it
better!)
>
>[CLIP]

>To make a decision now on the question "how many", would severely and
unnecessary limit our possibilities to deal with the question on the
environment and implementation for these new gTLDs.
>