Re: [wg-c] Comments

[Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>]

	Neither, I think.  It was a summary of the characteristics of the comment
set that are most obvious upon a quick glance: (1) a majority of them
support PPE; (2) most of those messages are extremely brief -- often
containing only a subject line, with the text portion blank. 

Jon



At 01:56 PM 1/12/00 +0100, Mark Measday wrote:
>Jon,
>
>Could you clarify whether this is an allegation of the equivalent of
ballot-stuffing
>or merely a note that the visionary qualities of Eric's paper struck an
appropriate
>demotic chord? I think Mr Brunner is owed that clarification.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>
>Mark Measday
>
>Jonathan Weinberg wrote:
>
>>         The comment period on the WG-C interim report is closed, with
309 comments
>> filed.  About 200 of them appear to be in the format "I support Position
>> Paper E" (Eric Brunner's paper urging the creation of .naa).  I'll post an
>> informal comment summary to the list as soon as I finish writing it.
>>
>> Jon