[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [wg-c] STRAW POLL
I support the following option for each question.
Question 1:
>4. ICANN should simply select new registries and leave issues of names and
>charters (including whether to limit the universe of people who can
>register in the domain, and if so how) to the new registries.
Question 2:
>4. ICANN should simply select new registries and leave issues of names and
>charters (including whether to limit the universe of people who can
>register in the domain, and if so how) to the new registries.
Question 3:
>1. ICANN picks a set of registries according to objective criteria.
>(Alternatively, ICANN narrows the set of applicants using objective
>criteria, and chooses among the remaining applicants, if necessary, via
>lotteries or auctions). Once chosen, registries pick their own gTLD names
>and associated charters (if any), subject to a process under which ICANN
>can resolve conflicts and can deem certain gTLD strings out of bounds.
Personal comment: I believe that ICANN/DNSO should require registries to provide a
list of new gTLDs that they intend to create when they apply for creation of new
gTLDs. This would help success of introduction of first 6-10 new gTLDs.
Regards,
Dongman Lee
--
Dongman Lee, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
School of Info & Computer Engineering
Information and Communications University
58-4 Hwaam-Dong, Yusung-Ku
Taejon 305-348
Korea
E-mail: dlee@icu.ac.kr
Web: http://www.icu.ac.kr
Tel: 042-866-6113
Fax: 042-866-6154