Re: [wg-c] Re: nine principles for domain names

[Eric Brunner <brunner@world.std.com>]

There are two charters these criteria could be applied to:

	the EU's, implicit in the request for comments, not
		to mention all the heated (American) Euro
		bashing that followed,
and
	the NAA's, implicit in the prelude to and body of
		Position Paper E, not to mention all the
		heated (American) minorities and Indians
		bashing that followed.

If these criteria have utility, they can be applied in to the
benefit of TLD applicants, to clarify and improve the text of
their charter.

If the Sheppard/Kleiman bullets can't be applied to existing
charter applications, do they matter or are they a refinement
on the marks position that no new aterritorial gTLDs are needed?

If the Sheppard/Kleiman bullets can't be applied to existing
charter applications, do they matter or are they a refinement
on the market position that no specific new gTLDs are needed?

The subject area is full of nuances and private little linguistic
ambushes. Decoding the Sheppard/Kleiman bullets is unnecessarily
difficult as a collective exercise if there is no text common to
all to which the apparent sense of some criteria can be applied.

Cheers,
Eric