Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: DRAFT WG-C REPORT

["Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

> 3. My reasoning, in asking that separate statements be supported by five
> votes, was that in a large WG there might be many people who held views
> that have essentially no support from anyone else, and that it would
> constitute not-very-informative clutter if we ended up with a lot of
> separate statements, none of them representing a view with significant
> support.  But I don't feel strongly about this,

I do feel strongly about this. The report is not a position paper or a
decisive document, it is just a report, and a pretty objective one, about
where our discussions have gone. Anyone who thinks Jon got it so wrong that
a dissent needs to be written had better be able to muster five signatures.

> 4. I'd like to hear what other people think on this.