RE: [wg-c] vote?

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 06-Mar-2000 Justin McCarthy wrote:
> Gentlemen,
> Agreed. It would be absolutely ridiculous to revisit every
> issue every time a neophyte chimed in. Progress should
> definitely not be stopped short. But, if a Co-Chairman can
> issue a report for a group without the approval of the
> report by the group, why have members of the group? Doesn't
> the very name "Group Report" imply (perhaps falsely) broad
> group support?

The report is nothing more than summary of the issues that the group has
already developed at least a rough consensus behind, either by list polls
conducted in the past or by there being a general sense that opposition to a
point was nearly non-existant.

It was posted to see if the list members could find any areas where he grossly
mischaracterized or misstated our existing findings.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4w7G48zLmV94Pz+IRAoE3AKDAVYEgcDtZa6WZORJ9qWVUulsjgACgvaxX
CyF1TBIlh6z3D8qfIVIUYjs=
=cpMs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----