Re: [wg-c] voting on TLDs

[Patrick Greenwell <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>]

On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 06, 2000 at 11:20:01AM -0800, Patrick Greenwell wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > 
> > > On Sun, Mar 05, 2000 at 09:39:57PM -0800, Mark C. Langston wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > You say that we have no evidence that a flood of new, inexperienced
> > > > registry admins will provide stable service.  Well, we have no
> > > > evidence to the contrary.
> > > 
> > > Actually, we do -- so much so that it is ludicrous to claim otherwise.  
> > 
> > Care to substantiate your assertion?
> 
> If you would think about it just 3 seconds, you wouldn't ask that 
> question.  

I did, and nothing in your customarily ascerbic response answered my
question.


 
> Here's the assertion:
> 
> "A flood of new, inexperienced registry admins/operators can cause
> instabilities in the registry service."

No, that was not the assertion. Please see above as to what the original
asserition was. The term "operator" was never used.

> This is a special case of the more general assertion:
> 
> "A flood of new, inexperienced XXX admins/operators can cause
> instabilities in the XXX service."

Not at all. The above is your attempt at extrapolation.

Still waiting for a response that backs your original assertion, which,
given the limited number of *registry admins* should be very intersting to
see.

Bonus points if you can respond in a civil fashion.

/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
                               Patrick Greenwell                          
                       Earth is a single point of failure.
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/