[wg-c] RE: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI

["William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 07-Mar-2000 bob broxton wrote:
> OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF THIS REPORT AS "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING
> 
> GROUP C OF THE DOMAIN NAME SUPPORTING ORGANIZATION, INTERNET
> CORPORATION FOR ASSIGNED NAMES AND NUMBERS"
> 
> As a member of Working Group C, I object to the release of this report
> "Report (Part One) of Working Group C of the Domain Name Supporting
> Organization, Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers"
> (hereafter referred to as "Report of Working Group C")  for the
> following reasons:
> 
> 1.   The  members of Working Group C have never given approval of this
> Report.  As such, this is not a "Report of Working Group C".

We know you seek to do anything to delay and block introduction of new gTLDs,
Bob.  After all it would cause a depreciation in the value of your ccTLD
registration service.

But your comments here are simply false.

This report IS a report of the Workgroup.  It summarizes the findings of the
workgroup and does an excellent job presenting the points of rough consensus as
well as the points of contention.

It is interesting to note that only yourself and another latecomer to the
workgroup C progress objected.  I think that alone shows that indeed this
report IS a valid report of the workgroup.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4xaWe8zLmV94Pz+IRAtAQAKC3P18PsBc00DcMQGer/u+GP/XxmgCg0KwG
FHAm43Pjwl6JPcTezHocc4w=
=TUsx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----