[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI

To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Subject: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 20:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ga@dnso.org, wg-c@dnso.org
In-Reply-To: <20000307180213.O11817@songbird.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 08-Mar-2000 Kent Crispin wrote:
> It would be fair to call Jon's paper a "Chair's Summary".  

Is there anything contained in the report that is substantively against the
rough consensus reached on the list, Kent?

If not, then it is more than a "Chair's Summary" even if the document itself
was not formally voted on.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4xdHl8zLmV94Pz+IRAjRdAKCMHZRA5/Z52ADFotM60kFPt/WZgQCgm1Fy
q0CgEvIAqJztAKQLHBgUeQY=
=90dJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
- Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI
  - From: Alex Kamantauskas <alexk@tugger.net>

References:
- [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
  - From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKING GROUP C...."
Next by Date: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
Prev by thread: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
Next by thread: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread