[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ON

To: Alex Kamantauskas <alexk@tugger.net>
Subject: Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ON
From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2000 06:23:55 -0800 (PST)
Cc: wg-c@dnso.org, ga@dnso.org, Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003080921240.4685-100000@varese.appliedtheory.com>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08-Mar-2000 Alex Kamantauskas wrote:
>  My .02 cents - I think the whole argument is kind of silly.

It's also moot.  The report has already been presented.

- --
William X. Walsh <william@userfriendly.com>
http://userfriendly.com/
Fax: 877-860-5412 or +1-559-851-9192
GPG/PGP Key at http://userfriendly.com/wwalsh.gpg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1c (Mandrake Linux)
Comment: Userfriendly Networks http://www.userfriendly.com/

iD8DBQE4xmJ78zLmV94Pz+IRAihmAKDeTpu73dbhkattAE/M60XOwjezwACgjUDR
R3ViD5Qe/JLHPWvQVU7e1ew=
=cj0J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:
- Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI
  - From: Alex Kamantauskas <alexk@tugger.net>

Prev by Date: Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
Prev by thread: Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE)OF WORKI
Next by thread: Re: [wg-c] Re: [ga] OBJECTION TO THE RELEASE OF "REPORT (PART ONE) OF WORKI
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread