[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report

To: "Jonathan Weinberg" <weinberg@mail.msen.com>, <wg-c@dnso.org>
Subject: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
From: "Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M." <rod@cyberspaces.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 18:24:40 -0500
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000310164025.02fb7534@msen.com>
Reply-To: <rod@cyberspaces.org>
Sender: owner-wg-c@dnso.org


"Registries would apply describing
> their proposed TLD, and an ICANN body or process would make selections
> taking into account the characteristics of both the registry and its
> proposed TLD."

I vote yes on this consensus call.

Rod Dixon, J.D., LL.M.
www.cyberspaces.org
rod@cyberspaces.org

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: "William X. Walsh" <william@userfriendly.com>
- Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: "Milton Mueller" <mueller@syr.edu>

References:
- [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
  - From: Jonathan Weinberg <weinberg@mail.msen.com>

Prev by Date: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Next by Date: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Prev by thread: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Next by thread: RE: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread