Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report

["Christopher Ambler" <cambler@iodesign.com>]

Image Online Design feels that if its 15,000+ paid domain
registrants in over 70 countries worldwide are any indication,
that .web is desirable. Should it come to a bid process, I
suspect we'd play along accordingly.

Christopher

----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick Greenwell" <patrick@stealthgeeks.net>
To: <david@aminal.com>
Cc: <wg-c@dnso.org>
Sent: Friday, 10 March, 2000 18:32
Subject: Re: [wg-c] IMPORTANT: WG-C Report


> On Fri, 10 Mar 2000 david@aminal.com wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > > "Registries would apply describing
> > > their proposed TLD, and an ICANN body or process would make selections
> > > taking into account the characteristics of both the registry and its
> > > proposed TLD."
> >
> > FWIW, this statement has my support.
> >
>
> Has anyone considered asking the community what TLDs are most desireable
> and putting bids out to run those TLDs?
>
>
>
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
/\
>                                Patrick Greenwell
>                        Earth is a single point of failure.
>
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
\/